Class-
I am conducting a little survey to get a discussion going on Boom Vang choices. There are several solutions and difference in cost for solid vangs from Garhauer, Quik Vang, Vang Master, Boomkicker, etc.
Practical Sailor recently did a piece on Vangs.
I would like to get comments from the class on the experiences and actual use of a variety of Vangs before I decide on which Vang to go with.
Thanks.
Solid Vang or Boomkicker. Choices?
Moderators: sderby, Tim Bosma, Tom Elsen
Solid Vang or Boomkicker. Choices?
Sara T. Allen - "Front Runner"
S2 7.9m Grand Slam Hull #50
Sarasota Sailing Squadron
Ken Thompson Park
City Island, Sarasota, Florida
S2 7.9m Grand Slam Hull #50
Sarasota Sailing Squadron
Ken Thompson Park
City Island, Sarasota, Florida
We have a solid vang with and internal spring, and a 4:1 purchase. We have been very pleased with it except when we need to really crank it on in a blow, it doesn't seem to go as far as we want. In those cases, we should probably be reefing the main. It also stops us from bringing the end of the boom down into the cockpit below eye level (I know, eye level is variable, I'm 6' and we have a short guy on our crew...)
-
- Minister of propaganda and lies
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 11:58 am
- Location: Deltaville, VA
We went with the Boomkicker. I beleive it is the lightest choice, and least expensive. It removes from the boom with only one pin, so its no problem when breaking down the boat.
The Garhauer is an nice unit, affordable, solid but heavy. If racing wasn't my primary use, I probably consider those.
The Garhauer is an nice unit, affordable, solid but heavy. If racing wasn't my primary use, I probably consider those.
Bob Fleck
Horizon 484
Horizon 484
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 6:01 pm
- Location: Gloucester Pt. VA